The program received high scores in areas such as the general atmosphere (4.82; on a scale of 1 to 5), teachers' expertise (4.73), and the quality of the learning environment. Students felt there was a safe climate for voicing opinions (4.89) and appreciated that their personal circumstances were taken into account (4.44). The connection to professional practice also received favorable ratings (4.09). Only curriculum flexibility and the balance between on-campus and online activities were identified as areas needing improvement. Overall, satisfaction with the program was significantly higher than in the previous year, indicating an improvement in the student experience and engagement.